As a Social Studies teacher within a
1:1 laptop school, I decided to go paperless for all written textbook
assignments. Going paperless meant that all written textbook assignments would
be completed through a word file and submitted via email. My attempt to go
paperless created challenges for me that were not anticipated.
This initiative was new to my
student and parent population, and needed much explanation to mitigate
confusion. The instructions for submitting their homework via email were
straightforward. All assignments would be submitted by 8:00a.m. and completed
on a “Word” document. I took efforts to explain the submission requirements
thoroughly via my syllabus, and also articulated the homework requirements. The
confusion and challenges, however, occurred primarily on my end. My email was
not properly setup to take on the task of receiving weekly emails from up to seventy-five
students. Furthermore, I also opted to grade my student’s papers digitally, and
would reply to every submission with an emailed grade, which most students did
not read.
I think the Attention, Relevance,
Confidence, and Satisfaction (ARCS ) Model of Motivational Design could have
been helpful to further establish a well-thought system. ARCS ideas around
relevance, in particular, if applied early in launch of the paperless homework
initiative, would have allowed for more of a dialogue to ensure my requirements
met the needs of my students appropriately. Relevance, as highlighted in the
ARCS model calls for the use of ideas such as “modeling” and “choice”(“ARCS
Model,” n.d.). Each of the listed ideas inherently would have allowed me an
opportunity to garner how I might make the experience more useful to my
students and myself.
References:
ARCS model of motivational design (Keller). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.learning-
ARCS model of motivational design (Keller). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.learning-
theories.com/kellers-arcs-model-of-motivational-design.html
I responded to the following blogs:
http://kietzeroweds.wikispaces.com/EDUC
http://isaacu.blogspot.com
http://kietzeroweds.wikispaces.com/EDUC
http://isaacu.blogspot.com
Bianca, I can understand the struggles with grading all work electronically. I have found I like to grade tests and quizzes electronically and our Learning Management System allows us to make comments back immediately they see when they log in. I have found I have more response back from my students with that system. I struggle with downloading all papers. At this point in time I do find that it is easier to grade most written work on paper than electronically, but I am not sure if that isn't due to my age and my experience of learning exclusively on paper.
ReplyDeleteBianca,
ReplyDeleteYou said "Each of the listed ideas inherently would have allowed me an opportunity to garner how I might make the experience more useful to my students and myself". What are your constraints?